US data center market
Capacity online and in the pipeline, who owns and uses it, and which grids it depends on.
Datacenter Source tracks 1,935 data centers in the United States, including 82 AI campuses. Facilities that disclose power add up to 19.21 GW online and 30.88 GW in the pipeline. These are floors, not market size: 12% of facilities have a power figure. Largest operators by tracked MW: Meta, Oracle and Google. 57.65 GW has been announced; 20.84 GW is documented as operational.
Online = operating sites; pipeline = remaining planned MW at sites under construction or planned. Percentages under each total show how much of it is backed by each evidence level.
ConfirmedBacked by a filing, deed, permit, interconnection-queue record, or a government or utility record. filing, deed, permit or grid recordAnnouncedStated by the company or reported in the press; not yet backed by a filing or grid record. company or press claimEst.Modeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. satellite, model or map inferenceHow levels are assignedAI data center capacity over time
Facility power at satellite-tracked AI campuses (Epoch AI timelines), quarterly
Construction pipeline by expected completion
MW from phases with a projected completion date
Power reality
Announced capacity vs. what grid records, construction and operation document. Facility-level sums; sources differ in coverage.
How to read this
Each bar sums one kind of evidence across facilities. Announced is the largest MW a company, utility, government or press source reported. Interconnection requests are MW in active large-load queue requests. Of the grid operators we ingest, only NYISO publishes these project by project. Contracted / approved means an executed interconnection agreement or a reported utility or power contract. Under construction and Operational come from construction records, imagery or operator reports.
The gap between announced and documented MW is capacity that has been claimed but not yet backed by a grid, construction or operating record. It is not proof a project won't happen. On-site generation is listed separately and never added to grid capacity. Method
Time to power puts each site's pending MW (announced minus operational) into a bucket by the midpoint of its evidence-based window. The window starts at the furthest documented stage and adds editorial ranges for what remains (e.g. announced: 2–5 yrs; land acquired: 2–4.5 yrs; planning / zoning: 1.75–4 yrs). Insufficient evidence means no dated stage evidence, not a delay. Windows are ranges, not forecasts. All ranges and rules
- Announced57.65 GW
- Interconnection requests—
- Contracted / approved3.67 GW
- Under construction27 GW
- Operational20.84 GW
Plus 366 MW of documented on-site / dedicated generation.
13.79 GW announced at 22 sites has no grid, construction or operating record yet.
- < 1 year10.51 GW · 13
- 1–2 years21.94 GW · 50
- 2–4 years14.63 GW · 96
- 4+ years— · 0
- Insufficient evidence— · 14
Bucketed by the midpoint of each site's evidence-based window. Windows are ranges, not forecasts.
- Meta Hyperion · LA5 GW / 2.2 GW
- Quantum Frederick Project · MD2.4 GW / 0
- PowerHouse Carlisle · PA1.35 GW / 0
- OpenAI Stargate Milam · TX1.2 GW / 0
- Meta El Paso Data Center · TX1 GW / 0
- Tract Morris · IL1 GW / 0
- Google Hermantown · MN1 GW / 0
- Hut 8 Beacon Point · TX1 GW / 0
- AVAIO Digital Little Rock · AR1 GW / 150 MW
- Coreweave Helios · TX1.63 GW / 800 MW
Interconnection queues
Active requests to connect to the grid (CAISO, ERCOT, MISO, PJM, SPP). Requests are applications, not commitments.
How to read this
A queue request asks a grid operator (ISO/RTO) to connect a new generator or large load to the transmission system. It then moves through studies (feasibility, system impact, facilities) before an interconnection agreement, construction and service. Filing is an application, not a commitment to build. Generation totals here are active requests only.
Why most aren't built: in the queue files we ingest, PJM: 52% of 8,147 requests withdrawn, 14% in service; MISO: 55% of 3,848 requests withdrawn, 2% in service. These are shares of each published file, not completion rates. SPP, ERCOT, CAISO are left out because their files don't include withdrawn requests. Queue sources
Data-center load requests are shown only where an ISO publishes them project by project (NYISO). Elsewhere, large loads go through utilities, and the ISO figures above (e.g. ERCOT's large-load tracking) are quoted from the operator's own documents.
“ERCOT is tracking approximately 410 GW of Large Loads seeking interconnection of which ~87% are data centers.”
ERCOT, 2026-04-09Coverage
How much of this scope our sources describe. Low coverage means data isn't disclosed or not yet collected, not that there's nothing there.
Confirmed evidence = at least one fact about the facility itself from a filing, deed, permit, interconnection record, or government or utility record. Regional context (state prices, nearby plants, utility territory maps) doesn't count. Most facilities come from OpenStreetMap, which records that a building exists but rarely its power, owner or status.
| State | Facilities | With power | Confirmed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia | 482 | 21% | 87% |
| Texas | 195 | 12% | 8% |
| Oregon | 136 | 4%(low) | 0% |
| California | 118 | 5% | 2% |
| Ohio | 99 | 11% | 67% |
| Washington | 72 | 1%(low) | 0% |
| Arizona | 67 | 6% | 97% |
| Iowa | 64 | 6% | 0% |
| New Jersey | 62 | 6% | 2% |
| Georgia | 58 | 7% | 0% |
| Illinois | 56 | 13% | 2% |
| Pennsylvania | 50 | 12% | 4% |
| Nevada | 41 | 5% | 2% |
| New York | 39 | 5% | 0% |
| Tennessee | 30 | 7% | 0% |
| Nebraska | 29 | 14% | 0% |
| North Carolina | 27 | 4%(low) | 0% |
| Colorado | 27 | 0%(low) | 0% |
| Utah | 24 | 29% | 0% |
| Wyoming | 24 | 8% | 13% |
| Missouri | 22 | 5% | 0% |
| New Mexico | 19 | 11% | 0% |
| Minnesota | 16 | 13% | 6% |
| South Carolina | 16 | 31% | 0% |
| Florida | 16 | 0%(low) | 0% |
| Maryland | 14 | 7% | 7% |
| Indiana | 13 | 46% | 15% |
| Michigan | 13 | 8% | 8% |
| Alabama | 13 | 23% | 0% |
| Oklahoma | 13 | 15% | 0% |
| Wisconsin | 12 | 25% | 8% |
| Mississippi | 10 | 40% | 20% |
| Louisiana | 7 | 71% | 43% |
| Kansas | 7 | 0%(low) | 0% |
| Kentucky | 6 | 17% | 17% |
| North Dakota | 5 | 40% | 40% |
| Connecticut | 5 | 0%(low) | 0% |
| Montana | 4 | 25% | 25% |
| Idaho | 3 | 33% | 0% |
| Arkansas | 3 | 33% | 33% |
| Maine | 3 | 0%(low) | 0% |
| Massachusetts | 3 | 0%(low) | 0% |
| New Hampshire | 3 | 0%(low) | 0% |
| South Dakota | 3 | 33% | 33% |
| West Virginia | 2 | 0%(low) | 0% |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 0%(low) | 0% |
| District of Columbia | 1 | 0%(low) | 0% |
| Vermont | 1 | 0%(low) | 0% |
States
Click through to drill down
| Name | Facilities | Online | Pipeline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 195 | 1.82 GW | 8.14 GW | |
| Virginia | 482 | 5.43 GW | 628 MW | |
| Louisiana | 7 | — | 5 GW | |
| Wisconsin | 12 | 442 MW | 3.57 GW | |
| Mississippi | 10 | 1.89 GW | 2 GW | |
| Ohio | 99 | 1.8 GW | 1.84 GW | |
| New Mexico | 19 | 114 MW | 2.61 GW | |
| Iowa | 64 | 512 MW | 1.9 GW | |
| Indiana | 13 | 1.33 GW | 1.04 GW | |
| Michigan | 13 | — | 1.4 GW | |
| Nebraska | 29 | 843 MW | 359 MW | |
| Georgia | 58 | 923 MW | — | |
| Arizona | 67 | 577 MW | 190 MW | |
| Alabama | 13 | 397 MW | 266 MW | |
| Oklahoma | 13 | 442 MW | 181 MW | |
| Utah | 24 | 179 MW | 411 MW | |
| Tennessee | 30 | 539 MW | — | |
| North Dakota | 5 | 88 MW | 442 MW | |
| New York | 39 | 107 MW | 392 MW | |
| Oregon | 136 | 428 MW | — | |
| Nevada | 41 | 214 MW | 175 MW | |
| Pennsylvania | 50 | 139 MW | 197 MW | |
| Wyoming | 24 | 182 MW | 67 MW | |
| Minnesota | 16 | 241 MW | — | |
| Idaho | 3 | 198 MW | — | |
| South Carolina | 16 | 90 MW | 78 MW | |
| Missouri | 22 | 126 MW | — | |
| North Carolina | 27 | 91 MW | — | |
| New Jersey | 62 | 70 MW | — | |
| California | 118 | — | — | |
| Washington | 72 | — | — | |
| Illinois | 56 | — | — | |
| Colorado | 27 | — | — | |
| Florida | 16 | — | — | |
| Maryland | 14 | — | — | |
| Kansas | 7 | — | — | |
| Kentucky | 6 | — | — | |
| Connecticut | 5 | — | — | |
| Montana | 4 | — | — | |
| Arkansas | 3 | — | — | |
| Maine | 3 | — | — | |
| Massachusetts | 3 | — | — | |
| New Hampshire | 3 | — | — | |
| South Dakota | 3 | — | — | |
| West Virginia | 2 | — | — | |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | — | — | |
| District of Columbia | 1 | — | — | |
| Vermont | 1 | — | — |
Largest operators & owners
Online + pipeline MW at linked facilities
- Meta2.95 GW + 7.86 GW · 76 sites
- Oracle590 MW + 7.7 GW · 5 sites
- Google3.66 GW + 2.08 GW · 96 sites
- Microsoft1.96 GW + 3.21 GW · 79 sites
- Amazon Web Services3.4 GW + 1.44 GW · 262 sites
- Vantage Data Centers287 MW + 3.26 GW · 24 sites
- SpaceXAI (xAI)1.73 GW + 789 MW · 6 sites
- CoreWeave900 MW + 1.46 GW · 8 sites
- SoftBank0 MW + 1.5 GW · 2 sites
- Related Digital0 MW + 1.4 GW · 2 sites
- Digital Realty1.22 GW + 0 MW · 89 sites
- Crusoe590 MW + 590 MW · 1 sites
Largest customers & end users
Tenants and workload owners, where sourced
- OpenAI2.52 GW + 11.5 GW · 11 sites
- Meta2.95 GW + 6.86 GW · 16 sites
- Microsoft1.63 GW + 3.21 GW · 5 sites
- Anthropic2.84 GW + 1.48 GW · 5 sites
- SpaceXAI (xAI)1.3 GW + 789 MW · 2 sites
- Cursor1.28 GW + 789 MW · 1 sites
- Oracle590 MW + 590 MW · 1 sites
- CoreWeave200 MW + 600 MW · 2 sites
- Google DeepMind286 MW + 0 MW · 1 sites
- Amazon Web Services139 MW + 73 MW · 1 sites
- G4258 MW + 0 MW · 1 sites
Utility exposure
Most likely retail utility by location (approximate)
- Entergy614 MW + 6.21 GW · 25 sites
- Dominion Energy5.42 GW + 628 MW · 472 sites
- We Energies442 MW + 3.57 GW · 7 sites
- American Electric Power2.22 GW + 1.56 GW · 71 sites
- Taylor Electric Coop INC - (Tx)0 MW + 3.2 GW · 3 sites
- Indiana Michigan Power (AEP)1.09 GW + 1.04 GW · 3 sites
- Alliant Energy0 MW + 1.59 GW · 1 sites
- DTE Electric0 MW + 1.4 GW · 7 sites
- Southwestern Public Service CO0 MW + 1.29 GW · 1 sites
- Bluebonnet Electric Coop, INC0 MW + 1.2 GW · 1 sites
- El Paso Electric0 MW + 1 GW · 4 sites
- Georgia Power923 MW + 0 MW · 58 sites
Grid operators (ISO / RTO)
By facility location
- MISO2.05 GW + 13.09 GW · 153 sites
- PJM8.53 GW + 3.7 GW · 763 sites
- None (non-RTO region)3.82 GW + 4.64 GW · 598 sites
- ERCOT1.82 GW + 5.85 GW · 176 sites
- SPP1.37 GW + 2.28 GW · 66 sites
- NYISO107 MW + 392 MW · 40 sites
- CAISO— · 105 sites
- ISO-NE— · 15 sites
Largest facilities
By online + pipeline MW; badge = evidence behind each figure
| Facility | Status | Online | Pipeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meta Hyperion · LA | Operating + expandingAnnouncedStated by the company or reported in the press; not yet backed by a filing or grid record. | — | 5 GW AnnouncedStated by the company or reported in the press; not yet backed by a filing or grid record. |
| Microsoft Fairwater Wisconsin · WI | Operating + expandingAnnouncedStated by the company or reported in the press; not yet backed by a filing or grid record. | 442 MW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | 2.27 GW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. |
| OpenAI Stargate New Mexico · NM | Under constructionEstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | — | 2.45 GW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. |
| Colossus 2 · MS | Operating + expandingEstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | 1.28 GW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | 789 MW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. |
| OpenAI Stargate Shackelford · TX | Under constructionEstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | — | 1.96 GW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. |
| QTS Cedar Rapids · IA | Under constructionEstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | — | 1.59 GW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. |
| OpenAI Stargate Michigan · MI | Under constructionEstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | — | 1.4 GW ConfirmedBacked by a filing, deed, permit, interconnection-queue record, or a government or utility record. |
| Meta Prometheus · OH | Operating + expandingEstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | 612 MW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | 716 MW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. |
| OpenAI Stargate Wisconsin · WI | Under constructionEstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | — | 1.3 GW ConfirmedBacked by a filing, deed, permit, interconnection-queue record, or a government or utility record. |
| Goodnight · TX | Under constructionEstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | — | 1.29 GW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. |
| OpenAI Stargate Milam · TX | Under constructionEstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | — | 1.2 GW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. |
| OpenAI Stargate Abilene · TX | Operating + expandingEstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | 590 MW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | 590 MW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. |
| Anthropic-Amazon New Carlisle · IN | OperatingAnnouncedStated by the company or reported in the press; not yet backed by a filing or grid record. | 1.09 GW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | — |
| Google Fort Wayne · IN | Under constructionEstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | — | 1.04 GW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. |
| Amazon Ridgeland · MS | Operating + expandingEstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | 273 MW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. | 735 MW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure. |
Facilities by status
- Operating1710
- Operating + expanding27
- Under construction94
- Planned74
- Unknown30