North Dakota

Name: North Dakota data centers
Creator: Datacenter Source
License: https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1-0/

Datacenter Source tracks 5 data centers in North Dakota, including 1 AI campuses. Facilities that disclose power add up to 88 MW online and 442 MW in the pipeline. These are floors, not market size: 40% of facilities have a power figure. Largest operators by tracked MW: Applied Digital, CoreWeave and Atlas Power Holdings (ND) LLC. 960 MW has been announced; 88 MW is documented as operational.

Get changes to North Dakota

Or subscribe in a feed reader: RSS / Atom

Cite this

Text

Datacenter Source. “North Dakota data centers.” /states/ND. Data as of 2026-10-12. Accessed 2026-10-12.

BibTeX

@misc{datacentersource_state_ND_2026,
  title = {{North Dakota data centers}},
  author = {{Datacenter Source}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{/states/ND}},
  note = {Data as of 2026-10-12; accessed 2026-10-12. Compiled from cited sources, including OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) and Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)},
}

Please also cite the original source of any specific figure (linked beside it).

What changed View on map →

North Dakota facilities:Download CSV JSON API docs

Floors, not market size. MW totals only add up facilities that disclose a figure (40% of 5 here); most sites don't, so the real totals are higher. “—” means not disclosed or not yet collected, never zero. CoverageData as of Oct 12, 2026

Facilities

2 campuses

Power online (floor)

88 MW

1 sites reporting

100%

Under construction (floor)

442 MW

planned MW at active sites

100%

Planned

—

0 planned sites (MW not disclosed)

AI campuses

88 MW online · 442 MW pipeline

AI compute

0.09M

H100-equivalents (est.)

Capital (reported + est.)

$2.6B

Online = operating sites; pipeline = remaining planned MW at sites under construction or planned. Percentages under each total show how much of it is backed by each evidence level. Average industrial electricity price: 8.21¢/kWh (EIA).

Confirmed filing, deed, permit or grid recordAnnounced company or press claimEst. satellite, model or map inferenceHow levels are assigned

AI data center capacity over time

Facility power at satellite-tracked AI campuses (Epoch AI timelines), quarterly

Observed (satellite-tracked) Projected

Construction pipeline by expected completion

MW from phases with a projected completion date

2026

2027

Power reality

Announced capacity vs. what grid records, construction and operation document. Facility-level sums; sources differ in coverage.

How to read this

Each bar sums one kind of evidence across facilities. Announced is the largest MW a company, utility, government or press source reported. Interconnection requests are MW in active large-load queue requests. Of the grid operators we ingest, only NYISO publishes these project by project. Contracted / approved means an executed interconnection agreement or a reported utility or power contract. Under construction and Operational come from construction records, imagery or operator reports.

The gap between announced and documented MW is capacity that has been claimed but not yet backed by a grid, construction or operating record. It is not proof a project won't happen. On-site generation is listed separately and never added to grid capacity. Method

Time to power puts each site's pending MW (announced minus operational) into a bucket by the midpoint of its evidence-based window. The window starts at the furthest documented stage and adds editorial ranges for what remains (e.g. announced: 2–5 yrs; land acquired: 2–4.5 yrs; planning / zoning: 1.75–4 yrs). Insufficient evidence means no dated stage evidence, not a delay. Windows are ranges, not forecasts. All ranges and rules

Announced960 MW
Interconnection requests—
Contracted / approved—
Under construction455 MW
Operational88 MW

430 MW announced at 1 site has no grid, construction or operating record yet.

Pending MW by time to power

< 1 year— · 0
1–2 years442 MW · 1
2–4 years430 MW · 1
4+ years— · 0
Insufficient evidence— · 0

Bucketed by the midpoint of each site's evidence-based window. Windows are ranges, not forecasts.

Largest gaps: announced vs documented

Applied Digital Center, ND430 MW / 0

Verified operating: 1Announced only: 1Unverified: 3

Interconnection queues

Active requests to connect to the grid (MISO, PJM, SPP). Requests are applications, not commitments.

How to read this

A queue request asks a grid operator (ISO/RTO) to connect a new generator or large load to the transmission system. It then moves through studies (feasibility, system impact, facilities) before an interconnection agreement, construction and service. Filing is an application, not a commitment to build. Generation totals here are active requests only.

Why most aren't built: in the queue files we ingest, PJM: 100% of 1 requests withdrawn, 0% in service; MISO: 77% of 87 requests withdrawn, 0% in service. These are shares of each published file, not completion rates. SPP is left out because their files don't include withdrawn requests. Queue sources

Data-center load requests are shown only where an ISO publishes them project by project (NYISO). Elsewhere, large loads go through utilities, and the ISO figures above (e.g. ERCOT's large-load tracking) are quoted from the operator's own documents.

Generation seeking interconnection8.86 GW · 38 requests

Gas 2.99 GWWind 2.39 GWStorage 1.36 GWSolar 882 MWHybrid 653 MWUnknown 579 MW

Coverage

How much of this scope our sources describe. Low coverage means data isn't disclosed or not yet collected, not that there's nothing there.

Data as of Oct 12, 2026

Facilities with a power figure40% (2 of 5)

50%50%

Facilities with confirmed evidence40% (2 of 5)

Only estimated evidence (mapping or models)60% (3 of 5)

Confirmed evidence = at least one fact about the facility itself from a filing, deed, permit, interconnection record, or government or utility record. Regional context (state prices, nearby plants, utility territory maps) doesn't count. Most facilities come from OpenStreetMap, which records that a building exists but rarely its power, owner or status.

Largest operators & owners

Online + pipeline MW at linked facilities

Online Under construction + planned

Applied Digital88 MW + 442 MW · 2 sites
CoreWeave88 MW + 442 MW · 1 sites
Atlas Power Holdings (ND) LLC— · 1 sites

Largest customers & end users

Tenants and workload owners, where sourced

Online Under construction + planned

None identified.

Utility exposure

Most likely retail utility by location (approximate)

Online Under construction + planned

Montana-Dakota Utilities88 MW + 442 MW · 2 sites
Northern States Power CO - Minnesota— · 1 sites
Mountrail-Williams Elec Coop— · 1 sites

Grid operators (ISO / RTO)

By facility location

Online Under construction + planned

SPP88 MW + 442 MW · 3 sites
MISO— · 2 sites

Largest facilities

By online + pipeline MW; badge = evidence behind each figure

Data as of Oct 12, 2026

Facility	Status	Online	Pipeline
CoreWeave Ellendale ND	Operating + expandingEstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure.	88 MW EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure.	442 MW ConfirmedBacked by a filing, deed, permit, interconnection-queue record, or a government or utility record.

Facilities by status

Operating3
Operating + expanding1
Unknown1

Counties

Local impact

Water, on-site generation and air permits, incentives, regulatory events and large-load tariffs, where a source documents them. Counts are of sourced records, not of the state's totals.

Water & cooling

0 M gal/day modeled at 1 site EstimatedModeled, measured from satellite imagery, inferred from community mapping, or computed by this site. Not a disclosed figure.

On-site generation & air permits

Not yet collected

Incentives

Not yet collected

Utility & rates: large-load tariffs

Not yet collected for this state's utilities.

Regulatory events

Not yet collected